Rittenhouse lawyers ask judge to declare mistrial over video

By MICHAEL TARM, SCOTT BAUER and AMY FORLITI

KENOSHA, Wis. (AP) — Kyle Rittenhouse’s attorneys asked the justice to state a mistrial adjacent arsenic the assemblage successful the execution lawsuit was deliberating Wednesday, saying the defence received an inferior transcript of a perchance important video from prosecutors.

Judge Bruce Schroeder did not instantly regularisation connected the request, the 2nd mistrial question from the defence successful a week. The assemblage deliberated a 2nd afloat time without reaching a verdict and volition instrumentality successful the morning.

At contented was a portion of drone video that prosecutors showed to the assemblage successful closing arguments successful a bid to undermine Rittenhouse’s self-defense assertion and represent him arsenic the instigator of the bloodshed successful Kenosha successful the summertime of 2020. Prosecutors said the footage showed him pointing his firearm astatine protesters earlier the shooting erupted.

Rittenhouse lawyer Corey Chirafisi said the defence initially received a compressed mentation of the video and didn’t get the higher-quality 1 utilized by the prosecution until the grounds information of the lawsuit was over.

He said that the defence would person approached things otherwise if it had received the amended footage earlier and that it is present asking for “a level, just playing field.”

He said the mistrial petition would beryllium made “without prejudice,” meaning prosecutors could inactive retry Rittenhouse.

Last week, the defence asked for a mistrial with prejudice, meaning Rittenhouse could not beryllium enactment connected proceedings again. That petition was prompted by what the defence said were improper questions asked by authoritative Thomas Binger during his cross-examination of Rittenhouse.

Rittenhouse, 18, is connected proceedings connected homicide and attempted homicide charges for sidesplitting 2 men and wounding a 3rd with an AR-style semi-automatic firearm during a tumultuous nighttime of protests implicit the constabulary shooting of a Black man. Rittenhouse, a then-17-year-old erstwhile constabulary younker cadet, said helium went to Kenosha to support spot from rioters.

He changeable and killed Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, and wounded Gaige Grosskreutz, present 28. Rittenhouse is white, arsenic were those shot. The lawsuit has go a flashpoint successful the statement implicit guns, radical injustice, vigilantism and self-defense successful the U.S.

He could get beingness successful situation if convicted of the astir superior complaint against him.

The quality implicit the video erupted aft the jurors asked to rewatch footage connected Day 2 of their deliberations.

Defense attorneys said they would entity to the assemblage viewing the drone video. The aforesaid footage prompted heated quality earlier successful the proceedings implicit method questions of whether a inactive representation taken from the video was distorted erstwhile it was enlarged.

The prosecution contends the video proves Rittenhouse lied connected the basal erstwhile helium said helium didn’t constituent his firearm astatine protesters. But the cardinal infinitesimal successful the video is hard to decipher due to the fact that of however acold distant the drone was and however tiny a fig Rittenhouse is successful the frame.

A compressed oregon lower-resolution video record is fuzzier and grainier, peculiarly if played connected a larger screen, said Dennis Keeling, adjunct prof successful the cinema and tv arts section astatine Columbia College Chicago. That’s wherefore radical moving with video footage are cautious to cheque record size, magnitude and different details aft making a transcript to guarantee the caller mentation is what they wanted, helium added.

Prosecutors told the justice Wednesday that the assemblage saw the highest-quality mentation during the proceedings and that it was not the state’s responsibility that the record got compressed erstwhile received by the defense.

“We’re focusing excessively heavy connected a technological glitch,” authoritative James Kraus said.

The justice said helium had “qualms” astir admitting the video during the trial, but due to the fact that it had already been shown successful court, helium would let the assemblage to rewatch it during deliberations.

But if it turns retired the video should not person been admitted into evidence, “it’s going to beryllium ugly,” Schroeder warned.

He said the mistrial petition volition person to beryllium addressed if determination is simply a blameworthy verdict.

If Rittenhouse is acquitted, the contented volition beryllium moot. But if helium is recovered guilty, a mistrial ruling would fundamentally void the verdict.

Julius Kim, a Milwaukee-based defence lawyer who has been watching the case, said a mistrial could beryllium declared adjacent if the justice finds it was an honorable mistake oregon a method problem.

But to triumph a mistrial, the defence volition person to conscionable a precocious barroom and explicate to the justice wherefore what happened really wounded Rittenhouse, said Ion Meyn, an adjunct prof astatine the University of Wisconsin Law School.

“You can’t conscionable say, ‘The authorities gave maine a lower-quality video and truthful I get a mistrial,’” Meyn said. “That’s a losing statement for sure.”

Earlier successful the day, the justice criticized quality sum of the lawsuit and second-guessing from ineligible experts successful the media, saying helium would “think agelong and hard” astir allowing televised trials successful the future.

He took objection to quality stories astir his decisions not to let the men Rittenhouse changeable to beryllium called “victims” and to fto Rittenhouse gully the tons that determined which jurors were alternates. The justice besides complained astir disapproval that helium had yet to regularisation connected the earlier mistrial request.

Schroeder said helium hadn’t had a accidental to work the question due to the fact that helium had conscionable received it and wanted to springiness the authorities a accidental to measurement in.

“It’s conscionable a shame that irresponsible statements are being made,” the justice said of comments successful a Milwaukee Journal Sentinel communicative from instrumentality schoolhouse professors.

___

Forliti reported from Minneapolis; Bauer from Madison, Wisconsin. Associated Press writer Tammy Webber contributed from Fenton, Michigan; Kathleen Foody from Chicago.

___

Find the AP’s afloat sum of the Rittenhouse trial: https://apnews.com/hub/kyle-rittenhouse