Prosecutor: Potter ‘failed’ Wright; defense calls it mistake

By AMY FORLITI and STEVE KARNOWSKI

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — A suburban Minneapolis constabulary serviceman who said she mistakenly drew her weapon alternatively of her Taser erstwhile she fatally changeable Black motorist Daunte Wright went connected proceedings connected manslaughter charges Wednesday, with a authoritative saying Kim Potter had been trained however to debar specified deadly mix-ups but inactive got it wrong.

Potter’s lawyer, though, argued that she made an error, saying, “Police officers are quality beings.” And helium appeared to formed blasted connected Wright, saying each the 20-year-old had to bash that time was surrender.

Potter, 49, is charged with first-degree and second-degree manslaughter successful Wright’s April 11 decease successful Brooklyn Center. The achromatic erstwhile officer, who resigned 2 days aft the shooting, has said she meant to usage her Taser connected Wright, who was Black. Her assemblage camera recorded the shooting.

Wright’s mother, Katie Bryant, testified astir the infinitesimal she saw her lad lying successful his car aft he’d been shot. She said she tried to interaction him done a video telephone aft losing an earlier telephone connection, and that a pistillate answered and screamed, “They changeable him!” and pointed the telephone toward the driver’s seat.

“And my lad was laying there. He was unresponsive and helium looked dead,” Bryant said done tears.

A mostly achromatic assemblage was seated past week successful the case, which sparked aggravated demonstrations extracurricular the Brooklyn Center constabulary presumption past outpouring arsenic erstwhile Minneapolis Officer Derek Chauvin was connected proceedings conscionable 10 miles (16 kilometers) distant for sidesplitting George Floyd.

Defense lawyer Paul Engh told jurors that Potter made a mistake erstwhile she grabbed the incorrect limb and changeable Wright aft helium tried to thrust distant from a postulation halt portion she and different officers were trying to apprehension him.

Engh said each constabulary had crushed to judge that Wright mightiness person a weapon and that each helium had to bash was surrender. And helium said Potter “had to bash what she had to bash to forestall a decease to a chap officer” who had reached wrong Wright’s car and was astatine hazard of being dragged if Wright drove away.

Prosecutor Erin Eldridge earlier told jurors that Potter violated her extended grooming — including connected the risks of firing the incorrect limb — and “betrayed a 20-year-old kid.”

“This is precisely what she had been trained for years to prevent,” Eldridge said. “But connected April 11, she betrayed her badge and she failed Daunte Wright.”

“We spot them to cognize incorrect from right, and near from right,” Eldridge said. “This lawsuit is astir an serviceman who knew not to get it dormant wrong, but she failed to get it right.”

Potter, who has told the tribunal she volition testify, was grooming a caller serviceman erstwhile they pulled Wright implicit for having expired licence sheet tags and an aerial freshener hanging from the rearview mirror, according to a transgression complaint.

When they recovered that Wright had an outstanding warrant, they tried to apprehension him but helium got backmost into his car alternatively of cooperating. Potter’s body-camera video recorded her shouting “Taser, Taser, Taser” and “I’ll tase you” earlier she fired erstwhile with her handgun.

Eldridge played extended body-camera video from the shooting for the jury, including the moments close aft Potter changeable Wright.

Her camera recorded her saying ”(expletive) I conscionable changeable him” and “I grabbed the incorrect (expletive) gun.” After his car rolls away, it shows Potter descend to the curb and beryllium down, further exclaiming “Oh my God.” Defense attorneys argued successful pretrial filings that her contiguous absorption bolsters their statement that the shooting was a tragic accident.

Engh said that during the stop, the officer-in-training smelled marijuana. He besides said Wright didn’t person a licence and gave the serviceman an aged impervious of security that was nether different name.

There besides was a warrant for Wright’s apprehension connected a weapons charge, which Engh said led that serviceman to judge that determination was a “substantial chance” that Wright had a weapon successful the car — helium was unarmed — and that officers had nary prime but to apprehension Wright. There was besides a restraining bid against Wright, the defence lawyer said.

“A tribunal of instrumentality directed him to apprehension him!” Engh shouted portion pounding connected the courtroom lectern. He told jurors it wasn’t astir expired tags by that point, and that officers besides had to marque definite the pistillate successful Wright’s car was OK due to the fact that of the restraining order.

He said this was modular constabulary enactment and that Potter made an error.

“We are successful a quality business. Police officers are quality beings. And that’s what occurred,” Engh said.

But defence attorneys besides person asserted that Potter was wrong her rights to usage deadly unit if she had consciously chosen to bash truthful due to the fact that Wright’s actions endangered different officers.

Prosecutors accidental Potter had been trained connected Taser usage respective times during her 26-year constabulary career, including doubly successful the six months that preceded the shooting. They accidental Potter’s grooming explicitly warns officers astir confusing a handgun with a Taser and directs them “to larn the differences betwixt their Taser and firearm to debar specified confusion.”

Eldridge told jurors that officers are required to transportation their Taser connected their non-dominant broadside and their firearm connected their ascendant side. Potter carried her weapon connected her close and her Taser connected her left.

Officers tin take to presumption their Tasers successful their work belts truthful they tin either gully it from crossed their assemblage with their ascendant manus oregon gully it with their nondominant hand. Potter had hers positioned successful a “straight draw” position, truthful she would gully it with her near hand.

“The lone limb she draws with her close manus is her gun, not her Taser,” Eldridge said.

The authoritative told jurors they would perceive astir respective policies that she says Potter violated, including 1 that says formation from an serviceman is not a bully origin to usage a Taser.

A assemblage of 14 people, including 2 achromatic alternates, volition perceive the case. Nine of the 12 jurors apt to deliberate are white, 1 is Black and 2 are Asian.

The astir superior complaint against Potter requires prosecutors to beryllium recklessness, portion the lesser requires them to beryllium culpable negligence. Minnesota’s sentencing guidelines telephone for a situation word of conscionable implicit 7 years connected the first-degree manslaughter number and 4 years connected the second-degree one. Prosecutors person said they volition question a longer sentence.

___

Find the AP’s afloat sum of the Daunte Wright case: https://apnews.com/hub/death-of-daunte-wright